Skip to main content

Tenure track, twins and prenatal loss

Life of late has been crazy busy. Technically the tenure clock is paused this year as I toll, yet the 2 year NHRPC grant kicked off last September as I returned from maternity leave, and I continue to make a stab at research and writing in the interim. But my life has changed quite a bit (and as such, the intermittent absence of the blog).

We welcomed twins last May, who are currently inches away from walking and continue to keep me on my toes in a daily whirlwind of activity. They came into this world exactly a year and a day after our devastating full term loss in 2015. Life is strange and odd, and often I find that I am still reeling when I think about the unexplained loss of our first. It has been difficult to move on, and feel a huge part of my heart remains with that baby. There are constant reminders- friends who had successful births around the same time remind me of the huge, gaping hole in our lives when I see their little one, or walking by the tree my amazingly thoughtful coworkers had planted on the campus grounds near the library in his honor. I continue to wear a necklace with some of his ashes contained in the black onyx heart and his name etched on the back. In the midst of all these emotions, there has been the looming job expectations of a tenure track position that don't give much room for complex grief and little ones.

I have had a pile of things on my bed stand I have wanted to read in the last year, which seems to grow a little taller every week. I'm often too exhausted or not interested in reading after the marathon that is getting 10 month olds to bed every night. But, I did have a recommendation recently from a colleague on the work/life balance that I somehow managed to read in just a few days (in part, thanks to the recent snow day!). It's called Professor Mommy. I found it to be a very real, honest look at academia for women who find themselves with two jobs- at home and the university. I skipped over the teaching bits, since that doesn't apply for me, and found alot of useful information throughout the book (particularly on really being selective on what you spend your time on!). And even a few tips on how to get some writing done when time is sparse. The one part of the book that I really simply did not agree with in the least was a short passage on selected citations in your publications. The authors feel that at some point in time, you must cite practically every top academic in your respective niche, mainly for the idea that they could be reviewing your file down the road. I'm sure there is strategy in this mindset, but maybe I'm more a purist when it comes to this issue. I only want to cite when it's relevant and exciting work- not as a means to complement someone's ego. And to echo an amazing 1 credit course at the University of Washington I found out about recently, entitled 'Calling Bullshit in the Age of Big Data', I'd like to also call BS. Not to say there's some great work from these folks that I would cite, but I also wouldn't cite without reason.

Anywho- This was way off the usual digital projects banter, which I will return to shortly, I promise. Besides the grant work, we are also about to wrap up the student newspaper project in the coming months. I am very excited to have this project almost wrapped. Newspaper is quite tedious in bulk. We had been scanning primarily from the bound volumes in the past batches, but for preservation reasons, sent microfilm out for the earlier issues this time around. More on this later.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Privacy and digital collections

This past October, I put in a book proposal on the topic of ethical decision-making around privacy issues in digital collections. It has been accepted by Morgan and Claypool, and I am cranking to meet a May 1st deadline to get this into print by November.

It's exciting, but also nerve-wracking and perhaps a little terrifying for a few reasons. Ethics is head space that I very much enjoy- This work will include a nod to an essay from Martin Heidegger, which oddly enough I used a different Heidegger essay in my museum studies MA thesis on the ethics of art conservation. The philosophy aspect in ethics is probably the most enjoyable part for me, but it's also unbelievably murky waters. I spent many years rejecting absolutes in my early twenties, though at some point I have to put the pen to the paper and just write. (Funny sidenote- This digital girl still prefers the analog. I write primarily on my laptop and then print out draft and edit by hand. I also hate, hate, hate e-book…

Accessibility requirements and digital collections

So, I have found recently it is possible to teach an old dog new tricks- For the first time in too long, I tackled an area that was completely new to me and have been diving into the world of accessibility requirements for digital objects. In part, this is coming as a response to a newer policy in place at Kent State addressing electronic and information technology accessibility.

Or for other digital librarians, a colleague at another university said "OCR'd PDFs just aren't going to cut it anymore". This statement I think reflects how many of us have practiced a simple approach to textual documents in the past. Batch run OCR before ingestion, and TADA! Done, or at least we had hoped.

But, as I have come to learn, this approach is does not fair well for screen readers or adapt for those with vision impairments. At Kent State, I've been fortunate to have some great folks in the Accessibility Office to offer advice and hands-on training (Thank you, Jason Piatt! My …